<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pshhhht&#8217;cooff</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.susieday.com/2008/12/09/pshhhhtcooff/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.susieday.com/2008/12/09/pshhhhtcooff/</link>
	<description>funny books for funny girls</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 14:06:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jess</title>
		<link>http://www.susieday.com/2008/12/09/pshhhhtcooff/comment-page-1/#comment-3681</link>
		<dc:creator>Jess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 13:39:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.susieday.com/index.php/2008/12/09/pshhhhtcooff/#comment-3681</guid>
		<description>Think it was browser - I got photo only in IE and all fine in Firefox.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Think it was browser &#8211; I got photo only in IE and all fine in Firefox.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: susie</title>
		<link>http://www.susieday.com/2008/12/09/pshhhhtcooff/comment-page-1/#comment-3675</link>
		<dc:creator>susie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 00:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.susieday.com/index.php/2008/12/09/pshhhhtcooff/#comment-3675</guid>
		<description>Josie - sorry, can you see it now?  It seems a handful of people have had problems: may be a browser issue?  Simon Groom got away with all sorts, bless him.  I was very much the Sarah Greene/Peter Duncan/Simon Groom era.  Oh, how your heart did sink whenever the phrase &#039;my parent&#039;s farm&#039; was uttered...

Rarg - I had no idea Sundin was Tik-Tok.  Truly you are a man to have nearby in the event of a pub quiz.  (It is a great film, though!  There are simply not enough heroic chickens in the movies these days.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Josie &#8211; sorry, can you see it now?  It seems a handful of people have had problems: may be a browser issue?  Simon Groom got away with all sorts, bless him.  I was very much the Sarah Greene/Peter Duncan/Simon Groom era.  Oh, how your heart did sink whenever the phrase &#8216;my parent&#8217;s farm&#8217; was uttered&#8230;</p>
<p>Rarg &#8211; I had no idea Sundin was Tik-Tok.  Truly you are a man to have nearby in the event of a pub quiz.  (It is a great film, though!  There are simply not enough heroic chickens in the movies these days.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rarg</title>
		<link>http://www.susieday.com/2008/12/09/pshhhhtcooff/comment-page-1/#comment-3597</link>
		<dc:creator>rarg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 16:35:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.susieday.com/index.php/2008/12/09/pshhhhtcooff/#comment-3597</guid>
		<description>I thought Simon Groom lasted for the best part of a decade? Maybe it seemed like it...

No, hang on, you&#039;re confusing him with Michael Sundin who definitely wasn&#039;t fired for being gay. Oh no. 

Incidentally, Michael Sundin played Tik-Tok in Return To Oz. Awesome film.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought Simon Groom lasted for the best part of a decade? Maybe it seemed like it&#8230;</p>
<p>No, hang on, you&#8217;re confusing him with Michael Sundin who definitely wasn&#8217;t fired for being gay. Oh no. </p>
<p>Incidentally, Michael Sundin played Tik-Tok in Return To Oz. Awesome film.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josie</title>
		<link>http://www.susieday.com/2008/12/09/pshhhhtcooff/comment-page-1/#comment-3596</link>
		<dc:creator>Josie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 13:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.susieday.com/index.php/2008/12/09/pshhhhtcooff/#comment-3596</guid>
		<description>Do you remember Simon Groom on Blue Peter? He was sacked after one series for too many unscripted comments, such as this one http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=lSO3-jKoRBQ

I remember that Noseybonk and I hated it. Erk, takes me right back! And Mr Bennet the caretaker was a bit scary.

Susie, have you been to Paris by any chance? And do you know why the blog post is just a picture with no text or comments?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you remember Simon Groom on Blue Peter? He was sacked after one series for too many unscripted comments, such as this one <a href="http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=lSO3-jKoRBQ" rel="nofollow">http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=lSO3-jKoRBQ</a></p>
<p>I remember that Noseybonk and I hated it. Erk, takes me right back! And Mr Bennet the caretaker was a bit scary.</p>
<p>Susie, have you been to Paris by any chance? And do you know why the blog post is just a picture with no text or comments?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rarg</title>
		<link>http://www.susieday.com/2008/12/09/pshhhhtcooff/comment-page-1/#comment-3492</link>
		<dc:creator>rarg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 15:00:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.susieday.com/index.php/2008/12/09/pshhhhtcooff/#comment-3492</guid>
		<description>I dunno, what I&#039;ve seen of In the Night Garden is pretty spooky.

Incidentally, Sophie Trellis-Boxface was not the reason darling Janet was sacked from Blue Peter. Sophie was already born by then. It was Janet&#039;s fling with a married bloke which resulted in Sophie&#039;s younger half-sibling which did it. Sophie is blameless (and rhomboid). Janet was gorgeous, true, but obviously something of a sleeparound, which makes her naughty. And that makes her doubly phwoarsome!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dunno, what I&#8217;ve seen of In the Night Garden is pretty spooky.</p>
<p>Incidentally, Sophie Trellis-Boxface was not the reason darling Janet was sacked from Blue Peter. Sophie was already born by then. It was Janet&#8217;s fling with a married bloke which resulted in Sophie&#8217;s younger half-sibling which did it. Sophie is blameless (and rhomboid). Janet was gorgeous, true, but obviously something of a sleeparound, which makes her naughty. And that makes her doubly phwoarsome!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
